Talk:Main Page

What should be here?
Having all the websites listed with logos is cool but won't work when there are more sites. It strikes me that there should be some overall information on the sites in WikiApiary on the front page. Any suggestions on relevant content for the front page? Thingles (talk) 11:28, December 31, 2012 (CST)

Further ideas:


 * 1) List of n most recent wikis added.
 * 2) List of most active wikis.
 * 3) List of wikis with most active user growth in last week.
 * 4) Summary statistics for some tags (namely Wikimedia? Others?)
 * 5) Summary information about Extensions in use.
 * 6) Expanded introduction.
 * 7) Call to action to register and add your own wikis.

Thingles (talk) 14:35, December 31, 2012 (CST)


 * + I go with this. Still a random list of n existing wikis like it is done now will be good too. --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 06:29, January 1, 2013 (CST)
 * When it comes to 2 and 3 Wikimedia wikis will probably have to be excluded since they will show up all the times. Since they run the "mothers" of all wikis ... --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 06:32, January 1, 2013 (CST)


 * Yeah. Probably create a concept that creates a large pool of sites that are filtered in some way and then select randomly from that. Thingles (talk) 08:05, January 1, 2013 (CST)


 * This will be an easy on. Did you already set up your cron? :) --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 08:14, January 1, 2013 (CST)

Tables are temporary
They look ugly. Will be replacing them with a templates output soon. Thingles (talk) 00:04, January 9, 2013 (CST)


 * I guess you are thinking of this. Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 14:29, January 9, 2013 (CST)

What about ...
... setting a fixed width for this website, something link 990px. I think this would make things easier especially with regard to mobile devices. Also we could avoid enormously long lines of text. --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 15:44, January 9, 2013 (CST)


 * I am not so sure about this any longer. Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 11:45, January 13, 2013 (CST)

Main revamp / 2
Heiya Jamie, I just added as a proposol some styling to the main page that support easier identification of the several sections. I used a also proposed WikiApiary colour scheme (FFAE00 - 100%, FFD88C - 45%, FFE4B2 - 30%, FFF0D8 - 15%) based on the colour which is used within the logo. I would also suggest to do a display:none for the title of main page. Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 11:45, January 13, 2013 (CST)


 * Thank you for the display:none --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * This blog uses some nice yellow coloured borders in WikiApiary style. I think we should change the colours from bluish to yellowish here to give it a more individual touch. --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC) PS Did I tell you that yellow is my favourite colour. :)


 * What about exchanging the smiley by a single bee as the favicon? Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Great idea! favicon updated! (It's cached aggressively, so will likely take a while to show up naturally.) Thingles (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * This is getting a better place by the minute. :) The caching is indeed aggressive, but I guess this is ok. --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Highlight current skin
In the Skins tab of a website, shouldn't the default skin be highlighted somehow? Bold would suffice, I think. --Waldir (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I would love to do this, but, I don't think I can. I get the skin information from the MediaWiki API using . Results for WikiApiary. This just shows me the list of installed skins. You can see some further conversation on this at kgh's talk page. I can't find an enhancement request on this per kgh's comment so I'm opening one bug #47216 for this. Comment/vote on that bug would be great so we can get some more information at least for newer sites.


 * This bug is actually getting a lot of attention. I am as surprised as pleased. :) --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2013 (UTC)